sammykwan

多謝大家既資料. 有個車行既sales話我聽, 2.4無可能慳油過2.0. 仲話2.4既波箱(無段變速)易壞好多喎
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 17:15

If you have heavy loading (take more than 5 people in the car) most of the time, then 2.4 will consume less gas than 2.0.

Otherwise, 2.0 should consume less gas.

If you compare CVT and normal 4-speed, I also believe CVT's life time is short. But it doesn't really mean it is easily to break down.

Some people has some old concept still thinking CVT is some sort of new technology stuffs, but it is actually last decade's technology la......

sammykwan

sorry ...mine is 2008 2.0

"無段變速易壞好多喎??!!"

hm...50/50.....i think it last very long if u maintain it well . say replace HMMF
CVT fuild every 2 years.....or even once a year in extreme con ...
x4dragstar400 發表於 22-7-2010 01:00

do you think CVT may have better protection on the engine coz it always keep the engine running at low rpm......
the real figure in our club.

0 x 2.4 engine broke down with CVT
3 x 2.0 engine broke down with 4AT

sammykwan

CVT may have better protection the engine
mextony 發表於 22-7-2010 01:27

then 激玩 and 無做保養 should be the key break down reason for both engine and transmission......